C’est toujours avec plaisir que je constate, malgré tes obsessions antijuives ( je n’avais pas encore rencontré le “judéo darwinisme” ! Une chose m’intrigue dans ton exposé sur l’évolution : l’absence de référence à Robert Dawkins “le gène égoïste“.(…) (*Michel’s parents were Jews of Polish origin, settled in France prior to WW2; both of us are physicists as first studies are concerned, at U. Berkeley we did graduate studies, Michel in computer sciences, I in geophysics) MG’s comment – So, few more words of explanation how I coined, and proposed for a general use, the term JUDEO-DARWINISM – I was able to do this ASSOCIATION of ideas using my endogenous biosystem IRSA, which I described in more detail during my speech “Hommage to Jean Piaget” at the recent “Mut zur Ethik” conference : 1.
–natural selection alone is the motor of evolution —————————- In case one does not know how Protestant 5 Solas have originated, I recall that Martin Luter has sublimated them from of teachings of St Paul, who boasted himself to be “” (Phil. According to Anthony Grigor Scott(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_Believers) everything of importance, which fills books of Moses in Old Testament, was inserted into “Letters” of St Paul – and subsequently into the canon of books of New Testament – by the decision of the Council of Nice in 325 AD.
SOLA SCRIPTURA — “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast […] And if by grace, then it cannot be based on works; if it were, grace would no longer be grace” – St Paul, a self-appointed apostle – Thes -11 ————————— 2.
Already in “Syndrome of Blind Watchmaker“* (1999) I indicated, in its introduction To obtain the wider acceptation of any scientific idea, its receivers should have their individual associative apparatus appropriately tuned-up for its reception.
In the Anglo-Saxon culture men are (were) grown since childhood with the lecture of the Bible, and thus the reality they perceive is in a large extend modelled by “directing truths” of the Holy Scripture.
In order to demonstrate up to which point the nihilism radiates from such ANTIZOOLOGICAL scientific attitudes, it is sufficient to quote once again the famous linguist Noam Chomsky, who pretended, in late 20th century, that “Essential aspects of our mental and social life, among them also the language, are determined as a part of our biological endowment, and they are not acquired by a process of learning and in particular by a training”.